Donald Tusk’s recent statements, in which he referred to the concept of “militant democracy,” have sparked considerable controversy and criticism. Tusk stated that in the current circumstances, after eight years of PiS rule, actions may be necessary that go beyond the standard legal framework, which was perceived by many as a preview of breaking the law. The claim that not all of his decisions “will meet the criteria of the rule of law from the point of view of purists” suggests a willingness to make decisions that are controversial, unconstitutional​ and unlawful.

Critics emphasize that such a narrative, based on the concept of Karl Loewenstein, has its roots in the political thought of the 1930s, which additionally strengthens the negative associations. “Militant democracy” assumes taking extraordinary measures, even at the expense of the rule of law, which raises concerns that Tusk is seeking to introduce actions that restrict civil liberties, such as the delegalization of political parties or assemblies​.
Moreover, these statements coincide with the awarding of a German award for merits to Tusk, which additionally fuels the narrative of his critics, who often point to the PO leader’s too close relations with Germany. In particular, politicians from the United Right warn that Tusk’s announcements are de facto an announcement of the introduction of a regime and the violation of Polish sovereignty. Such opinions were expressed, among others, by Antoni Macierewicz, who unequivocally stated that such declarations are an announcement of breaking the law and anti-state activities.

Tusk, instead of proposing reforms within the framework of the existing legal system, seems to suggest that certain actions in defense of democracy may justify breaking the law, which raises serious doubts about the future of the rule of law in Poland under his leadership. This type of approach, instead of being a defense of democracy, may pose a threat to it.

photo: youtube